Whats So Great About Mickey Mouse Hes Not That Funny
Why all the hate? THIS IS A GREAT SHOW!
I'm non a kid. But I totally imagine being a kid and getting greatly tickled by this new version of Mickey Mouse, when my kids lookout man it.
I'm not kidding, the new 'Mickey' series is like a tribute to arguably the most recognizable icons of animation, the mouse himself, Mickey! While some may believe that the modernized humor strays far from Mickey Mouse's original amuse, but I remember it'due south all the same.
The originals were known for their unusual, humorous situations, and natural language-in-cheek, purely slapstick, sense of humor. It made a child revel in the character of Mickey Mouse, the energetic, genuinely funny drawing mouse.
And if yous look at the new interpretation, it'southward pretty much the same. Same funny situations, aforementioned funny outcomes, and most chiefly, aforementioned funny character. Just expect at Mickey, derping around. Mickey'south all near having a good time, and that'south what this show shows perfectly.
I tin can't compare this with the originals, because of the modernized humor, but still, this is the show for the generation. My kids dearest this testify, and I exercise too, and for darn skillful reasons.
51 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Best modern rendition of Mickey and co.
This is probably the show that fabricated me laugh the well-nigh. Its setting in different places on the world with improbably silly situations visualised in dandy slapstick sense of humour is a whole lot of fun for all ages.
It is a stylised rendition which aims to look similar the old cartoons and I found it welcome in our present twenty-four hour period equally a way to honour the roots of animation. The series still uses elements of CGI, but not in a way that sticks awkwardly out.
Some of Disney's well known characters often make cameos in the series, too. See it and you will experience cleverly fabricated comedic situations with other beloved characters.
I detect this series hilarious, and if you like groovy slapstick sense of humour, it is a must see.
19 out of 26 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A 'despicable, detestable, deplorable desecration of Walt Disney'due south early works'--and that might be why I enjoyed information technology so much!
One reviewer for this show clearly hated it. They describe it equally 'despicable, insufferable, lamentable desecration of Walt Disney'south early on works'. I can certainly understand WHY they felt that manner, as the animation manner is Zero similar the classic Disney characters and it seems pretty cheap at first. And, I can certainly understand WHY they felt this way because the characters were doing many things that would make Walt spin in his grave similar a rotisserie. Imagine having episodes with a zombie Goofy, Mickey and Donald trying to hide their nudity, dogs urinating, bites existence bitten off Mickey's ear and a lot of very un-Disney-like violence!! It IS shocking and I could see how a purist would blanch at such things. Even so, I am NOT a Disney purist. Sure, I dear the old cartoons but volition quickly admit that Mickey's former cartoons were awfully sanitized--a flake too sanitized if you ask me. Rarely did Mickey have any sort of border--that was left to Donald and, sometimes, Goofy. But here, Mickey is a rather impish character--more than like you'd see in the very, very early Mickey cartoons and not the sweet and 100% wholesome guy you'd see in the 1930s to today! While the art fashion takes some getting used to, I can look past the cheap look. More chiefly, as I sat and watched these cartoons during a recent Disney prowl (where they pipe them into the rooms), I plant myself laughing louder than I ever have before with a drawing. Imagine blending a bit of "Ren & Stimpy" with Mickey--that is what you'll find in "Mickey Mouse" (2013). I love them and want more than!
28 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Laugh out loud funny and beautiful art-style!
You don't look a mega-monopoly company similar Disney to practise anything fifty-fifty a little flake far out, and they usually don't, but this splendid animation series dares to be lightheaded and utilize a unique and cute (funny) fine art fashion. Actually it goes dorsum to the roots of Disney animation because information technology's funny and not prudish and uptight like most Disney stuff quite soon turned into! (Ironically the creator of the series is named P.Rudish).
In my opinion this is the best thing they've done in a long time, it'south and then practiced it almost redeems Disney slightly for shutting downwards their traditional blitheness feature department. In that location's about x episodes available on Youtube where I live and I laughed out loud several times in every episode and was amazed by the cute backgrounds and funny drawn characters. (I wonder when they will make the full series available in the Nordic countries).
34 out of 45 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mickey Mouse is a great bear witness
Mickey Mouse is ane of those shows that but makes you desire to say wow that was a great great brusk. I actually don't like shorts simply this was the best short I ever e'er saw. Information technology is really a short that if you hated it and so there is actually something wrong with you that is how good Mickey Mouse actually really is.I but really really like this i of a kind bear witness it is really good I never saw anything like this in my life before. I actually hope that yous enjoy this wonderful curt that is actually a must run across brusk. I never saw anything this practiced before I mean it was really actually really good. I hope y'all enjoyed information technology as much as I did. It Actually IS A MUST SEE SHOW. Thank You for reading
29 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Horrible
I don't like the animation I don't like the storyline. Unfortunately this is for the new generation I think. I'm not able to disassociate it from the older episodes.
5 out of half dozen found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bully series of Mickey Cartoons here
Warning: Spoilers
These are nifty Mickey Mouse cartoons. 1 of my favorite ones of this is the one where Mickey and Minnie are in Italy and Mickey wins Mickey over when he was alone in the boat and Minnie comes correct upwards to it and they both sat in it and accept a nice spaghetti dinner together. Those ii are the luckiest mice in the globe. Also I really loved the catastrophe to the latest 1 which is the Hawaiian one correct later on the acua or whatsoever that spirit was called came and and then Minnie comes singing the melody that Mickey was playing and Mickey sits beside her and they both sing it together which is very cute and romantic. Mickey and Minnie are the all-time fictional couple ever. Great cartoons here enough said.
12 out of 20 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mickey Mouse
This show has insurmountable amounts of cluttered energy and I adore it.
3 out of iv establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Welcome Back to Disney Channel, Mickey
Warning: Spoilers
Mickey and friends are back, baby! WHEEEEEEEEE! They are complimentary from the clubhouse prison house, more than or less. Those shorts I saw on internet and Idiot box are the funniest shorts I've ever seen. Mickey Mouse is back equally his mischievous self, but however a good guy. I'm not a fan of Goofy's redesign, only I get they just want him in a Dippy Canis familiaris version, merely he's all the same Goofy no matter what he looks like. I don't concord that is like Ren & Stimpy because it'south not meant to be like i. Yeah, they go edgy sometimes and sometimes a bit gross, but I assure you it's not meant to exist like Ren & Stimpy. I hope. Also, who knows, mayhap they finally get their one-half hr Boob tube series. Simply in the meantime, I will enjoy those shorts and cherish them on Itunes.
How do you similar them apples, Hannah Montana? HEE HEE HEE!
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very much in the early spirit
I have to disagree with the negative critics hither - if you know the personalities and zany spirit of the animators at Disney early on - these feel dead on. I tin especially see Ward Kimball loving these.
This is *not* the Mickey and friends from the era where Mickey had been softened and made completely safe because he needed to exist a protected corporate asset - these are the guys who were completely bonkers and stole people'due south hearts in the beginning place.
If you enjoy the *spirit* of the early cartoons, and can handle something classic being updated to fit with electric current times, then these are entirely delightful.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hilarious
I'yard old enough to remember classic cartoons (Disney and others) which were slap-up, but these new ones are as skilful equally the old ones were and maybe even better in some ways. I'm at Disney World correct now at Pop Century watching them for the start time e'er on their Disney Archetype Cartoons channel and laughing hysterically. They remind me of Ren & Stimpy a trivial. I truly don't understand the person who said these cartoons aren't creative - huh? In my stance these are some of the most creative cartoons I have ever seen - really over the peak creative. People who are Disney purists who aren't open to anything new are the ones bashing this. I happen to dearest it (and tin't wait for Star Wars land either)!
7 out of 13 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hot Domestic dog!!!!!!!😂😂😂
Before I idea Mickey Mouse was but ok and that he was for babies. Disney doesn't similar to testify their quondam cartoons for some reason. Practice I grew upward with crap like Mickey Mouse Clubhouse. Just afterwards watching these I think wow Mickey Mouse is admittedly hilarious. These are some of the funniest cartoons ever. When ever I tell people Mickey is funny they say. Mickey he'south for babies oh you hateful the cartoony one that is funny.
viii out of 16 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hot Dog
These are the funniest Mickey Mouse cartoons ever made. They are and then creative and so funny. When always I tell people I honey Mickey Mouse. They say he is for babies only and so I say I like the cartoony version people say oh yeah that'due south awesome.
6 out of 12 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sicko Mouse
Alarm: Spoilers
I've watched 2 or iii episodes of this bear witness, and I hold with the person who said that it looks similar the people backside this are trying to give Walt Disney the centre finger. That's virtually the aforementioned matter my wife said when she saw it...and our four yr old looked scared or confused when it was on TV, and so we turned it off.
At get-go, the loftier ratings and positive reviews for this testify surprised me. Then I read more virtually the content (a pig who takes a dump on Goofy'south head, peeing dogs) and saw some agonizing pictures (zombie Goofy), and at present I know why so many people like it...people retrieve it'southward hilarious when innocent stuff like Mickey Mouse is turned into something mean-spirited and twisted. Everything has to exist primarily for adults these days, filled with innuendo and irony. Some adults have go playground bullies, they don't want to share Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck with "stupid babies".
This show almost makes me believe in that insane conspiracy theory which says that Disney is ruled past satanists. And it also makes me wish that the urban legend well-nigh Walt Disney and cryogenics is truthful...that sometime Walt, like King Arthur, is only asleep.
17 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mickey Mouse review
Mickey Mouse has been effectually with united states of america for over lxxx years in numerous shorts, films, parks, and trade. On June 28, 2013, a new series of Mickey Mouse shorts begun on Disney Channel starting off with 'No Service', a brusk starring Mickey, Donald, Goofy, Minnie, and Daisy.
In this series, Mickey and the gang, besides as the surroundings effectually them, have all been redesigned to feel a chip more than modernistic, but yet all the same archetype. The series maintains a pretty good ratings overall (case: IMBd 8.3/10) and has become main stream inside the Disney fan base of operations. The central theming of the D23 2015 Expo revolved around the newly designed characters of these shorts likewise!
The Mickey Mouse series has been running for about 2 years with iii MickeyIconseasons. The cast includes:
Mickey Mouse - Chris Diamantopoulos Minnie Mouse - Russi Taylor Goofy - Neb Farmer Pluto - Nib Farmer Donald Duck - Tony Anselmo Daisy Duck - Tress MacNeille
In some episodes, they parody Disney films such as Snow White in the episode 'Wish Upon A Coin.' There are as well many cameos within the series such as Gyro from 'DuckTales' and from the film, 'Cinderella.'
Overall, the series has been greatly adored for its humour and amuse, but has received some criticism especially for Goofy's redesign.
I personally love this series and I hope that y'all give information technology a endeavour if you haven't already, its pretty. That said, Kingdom Hearts series and the Mickey Mouse Clubhouse preserves the Mickey House history better then this series with better plots.
three out of six found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The All-time
The voices are spot on, better than who ever has been voicing Mickey, Donald and Mickey in recent times. I think whoever isn't liking these probably likes the banal, corporate, super PC, eye of the road crap Disney had been pushing from the ninety's. The backgrounds are beautifully designed and the stories are wonderfully twisted.
The show is irreverent and classic. My kids love it every bit I do and we watch it with joy whenever a new episode comes out. Tin can wait for a DVD collection of the series comes out considering I'm buying it! It is very reminiscent of the 1930's to 1960 era and often recalls back to it, I love how its multicultural showcasing Indian, Mexican, French ETC. cultures, locales and languages.
Our favorite episodes in gild are:
1.Ghoul Friend 2.Mumbai Madness 3.Feliz Cumpleaños! 4.Ku'u Lei Melody
13 out of 21 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atrocious
This is horrid. It'southward similar Disney Channel is trying to continue up with cartoon network on how weird they tin exist. Don't bother with watching.
3 out of 4 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I cry for the world.
I saw one episode where Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy (or the evidence tries leading me to believe who they are) try looking for a fictitious theme park chosen "Irish potato Land" only to be in the middle of a potato subcontract. I have never felt and then uncomfortable/embarrassed in all my life. I originally thought they were showing the old Mickey Mouse shorts from way dorsum when (or at to the lowest degree pre-2009, at the latest). Just again, I should have known better. I wholeheartedly concord with d_curlee85 and McFrogg on their reviews of that abomination--couldn't have said it amend myself. The animation and graphic symbol designs are a cruel sick joke, the characters themselves are non likeable in the slightest and are definitely Not in-character, and the humor (or lack thereof) is equally depression-brow and stupid as that of SBSP (or worse). I oasis't watched many of them (because my starting time exposure to it), then I tin can't really say that I establish anything redeemable--especially the animation/designs (deplorable to be a broken tape, but obvious flaws are obvious). While I practise admit there MIGHT exist some ideas similar to Mickey and Donald trying to brand Goofy'south dream (for lack of a ameliorate discussion) come up to life in that potato episode, the show is downright visually unappealing and in the auditory sense nothing but noise pollution.
These episodes--the entire show--is a consummate neglect! If you desire to watch a good Mickey Mouse related cartoon, I recommend sticking to the original shorts, the House of Mouse series spin-off, and the older movies similar the Christmas ones or the Three Musketeers.
13 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brush strokes from Nickelodeon
I'm a big fan of Disney, all this years Disney has been one of the best things ever. But this show is in my stance silly. The humor is constantly and admittedly disgusting, the design characters are so goofy and to me is kinda embarrassing to the Disney tone. If he replaces this series with a key dummy, no one will understand the departure.
i out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The typical modern animated show
The rules of the modern animated testify: 1-inexpensive wink blitheness, two-unlikable characters, three-annoyingly hysterical actions, four-crass humor. And even Mickey Mouse, the most charming of all cartoons, the Charlie Chaplin of blitheness, sold his creative soul to follow the trend of the worst empty era of cartoons history(2010-).
Now, I love absurd shows like Dexter'south Lab, Cow & Craven, Ren & Stimpy, but just like any testify subsequently 2010, fifty-fifty this Mickey series tried to copy their modern and "subversive" style. The problem, anyway, is not the act of copying, but the way 1 does it: this Mickey serial is just a carbon copy of that Cartoon Network humor and irony, and adds naught. Watching this series in that location's nothing, NOTHING more; and that's why it doesn't fifty-fifty feel 18-carat in its gags and situations: it's so mechanically based on others already seen way that every time I estimate exactly what volition happen: the gag, the facial expression.. everything. It's really simply a mechanical re-create, with no Disney touch(with no bear on whatever).
I think the one-time days: nobody had a more perfected and developed identity than Disney and its shows, even when they modernized themselves; but it's conspicuously non the case anymore. The point is simple: if this prove had not characters with the look of Mickey, Goofy, and Donald in it, nobody cared to watch it.
PS: Goofy from this serial is one of the worst character of cartoon history
21 out of 53 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poorly blithe, not at all like the archetype Mickey
I agree with d_curlee85. These new Mickey Mouse shorts are goose egg like the classic Mickey. They expect cheap, and the drawings look like a child was trying to copy Mickey, which might sometimes work in front view, simply not when the characters motility their heads. The movements aren't round either, I bet in that location are no 24-25 frames/2nd. This seems to be fabricated quick and dirty by people who don't know Mickey from his golden age. If at all it more resembles the comic book Mickey than the pic Mickey. Disney should have kept the expert animators like Andreas Deja oder Glen Keane. Especially Deja had done Mickey shorts before, which were bright.
This is just the inexpensive Tv set animation junk that you become past the dozen. Mickey became famous because he was cipher like the cheap animation of his time, but was washed with intendance and high quality. Maybe Disney should think about this aspect of Mickey's history as well. But past the looks of these cartoons, nobody at Disney seems to remember Mickey's history...
21 out of 54 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Saving Grace for Disney (aka My get-go review)
My sister and I have been a fan of Mickey Mouse ever since we were immature. When this first aired , I used to have very niggling involvement in it. And after watching a few of the Mickey Mouse Shorts, I started to be interested in it.
At times, the humor is funny, merely sometimes not. The storyline for each episode is interesting and absurd. And the characters are likable.
From what we have today such every bit the stupid "I didn't exercise it" show, Mickey Mouse Shorts is one of the best shows/shorts in 2010-2015.
(P.S: My sister's favorite episode is "New York Weenie", while I similar "No Service")
10 out of 19 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Remind me so much of the original
I Dearest these. Everytime I watch them, it seems as if information technology gets the early on, wacky cartoon feel just right. I suggest you sentry it if yous're into cartoons!
five out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not at all like Disney'due south earlier cartoons.
Last time I wrote a review on this, I realized I was non critical plenty and that I was too emotional. But, my statement still stands: I practise non like this new "Mickey Mouse" series for a number of reasons.
1. It's rushed. The stories are contrived every bit they often have to rely on horrifying imagery and hammered-in gross-out jokes. Because, time is money. In fact, a lot of jokes and story elements make no sense at all! Some of them are but at that place to make what little in that location is of a plot to work. (Sort of similar what Roger Ebert would telephone call an "idiot plot," in which all the characters would accept to exist idiots in lodge to make a movie'southward plot piece of work.)
ii. The characters are unsightly and scary. I'yard surprised nobody has said whatever of this, because I honestly felt uncomfortable when I saw these new character designs, specially Goofy. When I come across different facial expressions (like when Minnie takes a bit out of a hot dog), something just came over me -- like I was watching MAD on Cartoon Network, when I wanted to watch a Disney cartoon. In other words, a feeling of uncleanliness. Non to mention some other characters look totally out of place. For example, in "New York Weenie," the lion at the very terminate looked similar information technology came from a totally unlike cartoon or picture; it's similar a unlike artist drew that lion and not even the animators did anything to gear up it to fit their style. Even worse was when I saw Mickey in that same short: he looked very unnerving when he took on all the unlike roughshod-looking and stalker-ish expressions. Not once did I express joy. Which, somehow, brings me to my next point.
3. The characters are out of character. The people responsible for these cartoons obviously put a bare minimum amount of effort in doing their research on classic Disney characters. Heck, some of them don't appear until later shorts! It's like they were trying to hibernate their laziness in adding characters who would have fit roles better than the ones they used did. "No Service" is ane such brusk where I saw a lot of out-of-character moments. Goofy, who runs a pier-side burger shack, acts similar a bossy jerk. Donald is style besides crude. Mickey is an idiot.
Just, let'south be more specific hither. Outset off, who is Goofy? He's a humble, lovable dimwit with a sense of decency. Hither, he's bossy, inconsiderate and scratches his belly button when he talks about grade. Not to mention cross-dressing in Central Park. A one thousand thousand laughs.
Now, what about Donald? I mean, shoving his butt in Mickey's face? Making a barrel innuendo joke? ("Await at those hot buns!" while Mickey, nude, is exterior the restaurant, in particular.) And laughing at Mickey'southward misery as he is forced to streak the pier after deciding to take all Mickey's clothes just to become nutrient? That is too crude. Donald Duck would pull pranks on other guys (specially little guys and his nephews), but he wouldn't deliberately embarrass, humiliate or hurt them. Unless he's angry, at least. But here, non in one case does Donald get ticked off. Correct away, he is already rude and rough.
Next, permit'south focus on Mickey. He'south mischievous yet innocent. He has a meliorate conscience than Donald, and he certainly knows better than to cause problems of any kind. But, in these cartoons, he'due south just a trouble-making imp! I mean, peering into baby carriages? Agreeing to requite away his clothes simply and so Donald can become lunch (stupid idea, in the outset identify)? And streaking along the pier? I hateful, he could accept just gone to get some spare apparel. Or he and Donald could have simply not lend the other apparel and risk indecent exposure in a public place.
I last trouble.
4. These cartoons are NOT funny. They have NO respect for Disney's visions and ideas of amusement. They show NO consideration for their audience or their intelligence. They exercise NOT respect or sympathize the source fabric. They are offensive, vulgar, grotesque, nauseating and unnerving. Information technology'south only some other sellout made to give the people responsible for these cartoons a quick buck. In fact, these "Mickey Mouse" cartoons may too exist the equivalent of the production staff's giving a giant middle finger to Walt Disney for his desire to share his visions with the remainder of the world, and a giant middle finger to families everywhere for appreciating the actual cartoons and films that shaped their childhoods and helped define their personalities. Worst of all, the very idea of cartoons like this modern "Mickey Mouse" shaping the childhoods of today's young generation and defining their personalities induces as much lingering pain as an IBS set on.
At present, I'k not trying to be a Disney purist and I'chiliad not proverb all of Disney's works in the past were perfect. Simply, when Walt Disney and his Nine Old Men were around, they put a lot of effort into their works. Each past work is cleverly idea out, has a smooth quality of animation with an excellent pacing, provides plenty of laughs in a way that people will call back for years to come and -- nigh of all -- teaches morals in a timeless and captivating way or just tells clever jokes.
Disney's officials claim these new "Mickey Mouse" cartoons are a throwback to the 1930s cartoons and follow the same formula Disney used in those cartoons. However, I find that to be an utter prevarication. We have seen many reincarnations of Mickey Mouse and his friends, all done by different people with their own styles and visions. Even video games like Kingdom Hearts nonetheless have something that preserves the integrity of Mickey Mouse and his friends. But, do these cartoons on Disney Channel and YouTube manage to preserve that same integrity? The answer to that question is a big, fat NO.
25 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For some reason IMDb did not accept my beginning review.
I don't empathise why. But maybe information technology was they thought information technology was likewise long? Well in the previous review I mentioned I concur completely with the other iii hated information technology reviews. While I don't think this show is quite as bad as Shake it Upwardly or Dog with a Blog it's nonetheless awful. It's at least better than the horrible shows Nick has been giving us since 2008 but it'due south all the same awful. And it'due south slow. And I mentioned last time I hate how this is rated higher than Gordy even though Gordy is and so much better! If it were up to me the rating for this show would switch with Gordy's. Because come on people. Gordy was adorable and heartwarming. I mentioned final time if yous think Gordy sounded dark well many of Disney's movies take night parts. I named a few examples but does IMDb recollect I went on a tangent or something? I don't know, I'm trying to make certain they have it this time. Long story short I detest this is rated higher than Gordy or Teletubbies and I already reviewed both explaining why both deserve college. And Liv and Maddie has the aforementioned as Rabbids Invasion at TV.com. I don't know why. I'd be like if they rated SpongeBob the same as Breadwinners. But so again SpongeBob has awful episodes too but I retrieve I went on a tangent about that too. I requite this show a three because it'south not every bit bad every bit Milkshake it Upward or Dog with a Blog or whatsoever show on my list Worst new Nick shows since 2008. OK, this about information technology for me this fourth dimension I don't want this review rejected. But to conclude I agree this is non a proficient evidence and I even didn't like the commercials for it. Whereas when I saw the commercials for Liv and Maddie I saw potential. So yeah I requite this show a 2.75/10 and Liv and Maddie nine.75/x because Liv and Maddie is then much better! And so'due south Teletubbies which I rate 8.75. That wraps this upward please accept this IMDb this time!
14 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2768802/reviews
0 Response to "Whats So Great About Mickey Mouse Hes Not That Funny"
Enregistrer un commentaire